DARK CHOCOLATE CANDY COATED VALENTINE'S ALMONDS vs TGF
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TGF wins in 5 out of 12 nutrient categories
DARK CHOCOLATE CANDY COATED VALENTINE'S ALMONDS: 3
vs
TGF: 5
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | DARK CHOCOLATE CANDY COATED VALENTINE'S ALMONDS | TGF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 467 cal | 567 cal | |
| Protein | 6.7 g | 20 g | |
| Carbs | 56.7 g | 20 g | |
| Fat | 30 g | 50 g | |
| Fiber | 6.7 g | 13.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | DARK CHOCOLATE CANDY COATED VALENTINE'S ALMONDS | TGF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | DARK CHOCOLATE CANDY COATED VALENTINE'S ALMONDS | TGF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 67 MG | 267 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.6 MG | 4.8 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 233 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |