CULINARY CUTS GROUND CHUCK vs BACON WRAPPED FILET OF BEEF
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BACON WRAPPED FILET OF BEEF wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
CULINARY CUTS GROUND CHUCK: 2
vs
BACON WRAPPED FILET OF BEEF: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CULINARY CUTS GROUND CHUCK | BACON WRAPPED FILET OF BEEF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 295 cal | 183 cal | |
| Protein | 16.1 g | 16.9 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0.7 g | |
| Fat | 25 g | 12.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CULINARY CUTS GROUND CHUCK | BACON WRAPPED FILET OF BEEF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CULINARY CUTS GROUND CHUCK | BACON WRAPPED FILET OF BEEF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 18 MG | 14 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.6 MG | 1.9 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 67 MG | 585 MG |