CUBED COOKED UNCURED HAM vs VIRGINIA BRAND LOWER SODIUM HAM
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CUBED COOKED UNCURED HAM wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
CUBED COOKED UNCURED HAM: 5
vs
VIRGINIA BRAND LOWER SODIUM HAM: 1
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CUBED COOKED UNCURED HAM | VIRGINIA BRAND LOWER SODIUM HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 107 cal | 128 cal | |
| Protein | 17.9 g | 17.0 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 6.4 g | |
| Fat | 2.7 g | 3.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CUBED COOKED UNCURED HAM | VIRGINIA BRAND LOWER SODIUM HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CUBED COOKED UNCURED HAM | VIRGINIA BRAND LOWER SODIUM HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 0.8 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 946 MG | 681 MG |