CRINKLE CUT FRIES vs BATTERED ONION RINGS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CRINKLE CUT FRIES wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
CRINKLE CUT FRIES: 6
vs
BATTERED ONION RINGS: 4
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CRINKLE CUT FRIES | BATTERED ONION RINGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 143 cal | 271 cal | |
| Protein | 2.4 g | 3.5 g | |
| Carbs | 23.8 g | 28.2 g | |
| Fat | 4.8 g | 16.5 g | |
| Fiber | 2.4 g | 1.2 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CRINKLE CUT FRIES | BATTERED ONION RINGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 1.4 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CRINKLE CUT FRIES | BATTERED ONION RINGS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 20 MG | 24 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.5 MG | 0.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 417 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 333 MG | 400 MG |