CRACKER JACK vs DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
CRACKER JACK: 3
vs
DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CRACKER JACK | DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 393 cal | 600 cal | |
| Protein | 3.6 g | 10 g | |
| Carbs | 89.3 g | 46.7 g | |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 43.3 g | |
| Fiber | 3.6 g | 6.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CRACKER JACK | DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CRACKER JACK | DARK CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 4.8 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 233 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 679 MG | 0 MG |