COTTONDALE vs WACKYM'S KITCHEN
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WACKYM'S KITCHEN wins in 7 out of 10 nutrient categories
COTTONDALE: 1
vs
WACKYM'S KITCHEN: 7
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | COTTONDALE | WACKYM'S KITCHEN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 536 cal | 421 cal | |
| Protein | 3.6 g | 7.1 g | |
| Carbs | 64.3 g | 60.7 g | |
| Fat | 32.1 g | 17.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 7.1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | COTTONDALE | WACKYM'S KITCHEN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | COTTONDALE | WACKYM'S KITCHEN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 143 MG | 71 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 2.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 107 MG | 132 MG |