CORNED BEEF HASH vs CANNED WHOLE CHICKEN WITHOUT GIBLETS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CORNED BEEF HASH wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
CORNED BEEF HASH: 5
vs
CANNED WHOLE CHICKEN WITHOUT GIBLETS: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CORNED BEEF HASH | CANNED WHOLE CHICKEN WITHOUT GIBLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 161 cal | 161 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 7.6 g | 10.7 g | |
| Carbs | 9.3 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 10.2 g | 12.5 g | |
| Fiber | 0.8 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CORNED BEEF HASH | CANNED WHOLE CHICKEN WITHOUT GIBLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CORNED BEEF HASH | CANNED WHOLE CHICKEN WITHOUT GIBLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 8 MG | 71 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 191 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 419 MG | 268 MG |