COOKED SHRIMP vs SQUID TUBES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
COOKED SHRIMP wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
COOKED SHRIMP: 5
vs
SQUID TUBES: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | COOKED SHRIMP | SQUID TUBES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 119 cal | 97 cal | |
| Protein | 22.6 g | 15.9 g | |
| Carbs | 1.2 g | 2.7 g | |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | COOKED SHRIMP | SQUID TUBES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 5.3 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | COOKED SHRIMP | SQUID TUBES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 95 MG | 35 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.4 MG | 1.0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 167 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 952 MG | 44 MG |