COOK AND SERVE SMOKED PORK HAM SHANKS vs 100% GRASS-FED ORGANIC BEEF SIRLOIN STEAK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 10 nutrient categories
COOK AND SERVE SMOKED PORK HAM SHANKS: 3
vs
100% GRASS-FED ORGANIC BEEF SIRLOIN STEAK: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | COOK AND SERVE SMOKED PORK HAM SHANKS | 100% GRASS-FED ORGANIC BEEF SIRLOIN STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 271 cal | 125 cal | |
| Protein | 22.4 g | 21.4 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 20 g | 4.5 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | COOK AND SERVE SMOKED PORK HAM SHANKS | 100% GRASS-FED ORGANIC BEEF SIRLOIN STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | COOK AND SERVE SMOKED PORK HAM SHANKS | 100% GRASS-FED ORGANIC BEEF SIRLOIN STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 71 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.7 MG | 2.4 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,400 MG | 58 MG |