CONTESSA vs UNCOOKED EASY-TO-PEEL COLOSSAL SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
UNCOOKED EASY-TO-PEEL COLOSSAL SHRIMP wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
CONTESSA: 3
vs
UNCOOKED EASY-TO-PEEL COLOSSAL SHRIMP: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CONTESSA | UNCOOKED EASY-TO-PEEL COLOSSAL SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 265 cal | 71 cal | |
| Protein | 8.0 g | 15.9 g | |
| Carbs | 3.5 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 23.9 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 1.8 g | 0.9 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CONTESSA | UNCOOKED EASY-TO-PEEL COLOSSAL SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CONTESSA | UNCOOKED EASY-TO-PEEL COLOSSAL SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 133 MG | 18 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.6 MG | 1.6 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 743 MG | 487 MG |