CONEY ISLAND CLASSICS vs MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS wins in 5 out of 12 nutrient categories
CONEY ISLAND CLASSICS: 4
vs
MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CONEY ISLAND CLASSICS | MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 536 cal | 500 cal | |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 6.7 g | |
| Carbs | 53.6 g | 63.3 g | |
| Fat | 32.1 g | 30 g | |
| Fiber | 14.3 g | 3.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CONEY ISLAND CLASSICS | MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CONEY ISLAND CLASSICS | MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 67 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 3.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 233 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 446 MG | 33 MG |