COLD SMOKED WILD CAUGHT ALASKA SOCKEYE SALMON vs FARMED TILAPIA FILLET
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
FARMED TILAPIA FILLET wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
COLD SMOKED WILD CAUGHT ALASKA SOCKEYE SALMON: 2
vs
FARMED TILAPIA FILLET: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | COLD SMOKED WILD CAUGHT ALASKA SOCKEYE SALMON | FARMED TILAPIA FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 211 cal | 94 cal | |
| Protein | 26.3 g | 20.3 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 10.5 g | 1.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | COLD SMOKED WILD CAUGHT ALASKA SOCKEYE SALMON | FARMED TILAPIA FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | COLD SMOKED WILD CAUGHT ALASKA SOCKEYE SALMON | FARMED TILAPIA FILLET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 16 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,105 MG | 51 MG |