COBIA BONELESS FILLETS vs SLOW-ROASTED ORIGINAL SALMON
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SLOW-ROASTED ORIGINAL SALMON wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
COBIA BONELESS FILLETS: 1
vs
SLOW-ROASTED ORIGINAL SALMON: 6
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | COBIA BONELESS FILLETS | SLOW-ROASTED ORIGINAL SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 243 cal | 140 cal | |
| Protein | 15.5 g | 26.3 g | |
| Carbs | 12.0 g | 3.5 g | |
| Fat | 14.1 g | 2.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | COBIA BONELESS FILLETS | SLOW-ROASTED ORIGINAL SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 2.1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | COBIA BONELESS FILLETS | SLOW-ROASTED ORIGINAL SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.3 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 373 MG | 912 MG |