COATED CRISPED RICE TREATS vs LUNDS & BYERLYS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LUNDS & BYERLYS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
COATED CRISPED RICE TREATS: 3
vs
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | COATED CRISPED RICE TREATS | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 456 cal | 382 cal | |
| Protein | 3.5 g | 5.5 g | |
| Carbs | 66.7 g | 38.2 g | |
| Fat | 19.3 g | 23.6 g | |
| Fiber | 1.8 g | 1.8 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | COATED CRISPED RICE TREATS | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 2.2 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | COATED CRISPED RICE TREATS | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 35 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.2 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 211 MG | 273 MG |