CLASSIC WHEAT THIN-BAKED CRACKERS vs LANCE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LANCE wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
CLASSIC WHEAT THIN-BAKED CRACKERS: 4
vs
LANCE: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CLASSIC WHEAT THIN-BAKED CRACKERS | LANCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 419 cal | 487 cal | |
| Protein | 6.5 g | 7.7 g | |
| Carbs | 74.2 g | 66.7 g | |
| Fat | 14.5 g | 23.1 g | |
| Fiber | 9.7 g | 2.6 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CLASSIC WHEAT THIN-BAKED CRACKERS | LANCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CLASSIC WHEAT THIN-BAKED CRACKERS | LANCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 205 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.3 MG | 2.8 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 323 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 645 MG | 744 MG |