CLASSIC PORK SAUSAGE vs BACON WRAPPED ANGUS BEEF FILET
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BACON WRAPPED ANGUS BEEF FILET wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
CLASSIC PORK SAUSAGE: 3
vs
BACON WRAPPED ANGUS BEEF FILET: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CLASSIC PORK SAUSAGE | BACON WRAPPED ANGUS BEEF FILET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 375 cal | 183 cal | |
| Protein | 17.9 g | 16.9 g | |
| Carbs | 1.8 g | 0.7 g | |
| Fat | 32.1 g | 12.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CLASSIC PORK SAUSAGE | BACON WRAPPED ANGUS BEEF FILET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CLASSIC PORK SAUSAGE | BACON WRAPPED ANGUS BEEF FILET | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 14 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.9 MG | 1.9 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,375 MG | 585 MG |