CLASSIC PLANT-BASED LINKS vs MAPLE & SAGE CHICKEN SAUSAGE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MAPLE & SAGE CHICKEN SAUSAGE wins in 5 out of 12 nutrient categories
CLASSIC PLANT-BASED LINKS: 4
vs
MAPLE & SAGE CHICKEN SAUSAGE: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CLASSIC PLANT-BASED LINKS | MAPLE & SAGE CHICKEN SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 283 cal | 155 cal | |
| Protein | 17.4 g | 18.3 g | |
| Carbs | 6.5 g | 4.2 g | |
| Fat | 19.6 g | 7.0 g | |
| Fiber | 4.3 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CLASSIC PLANT-BASED LINKS | MAPLE & SAGE CHICKEN SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CLASSIC PLANT-BASED LINKS | MAPLE & SAGE CHICKEN SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 109 MG | 28 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.9 MG | 1.0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 478 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 522 MG | 746 MG |