CIOPPINO MUSSELS vs SKINLESS WILD ALASKA ROCKFISH FILLETS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CIOPPINO MUSSELS wins in 6 out of 12 nutrient categories
CIOPPINO MUSSELS: 6
vs
SKINLESS WILD ALASKA ROCKFISH FILLETS: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CIOPPINO MUSSELS | SKINLESS WILD ALASKA ROCKFISH FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 81 cal | 88 cal | |
| Protein | 15.4 g | 18.6 g | |
| Carbs | 3.1 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 2.4 g | 1.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0.9 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CIOPPINO MUSSELS | SKINLESS WILD ALASKA ROCKFISH FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CIOPPINO MUSSELS | SKINLESS WILD ALASKA ROCKFISH FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 35 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.8 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 4 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 410 MG | 75 MG |