CINNAMON ROLLS vs NATURAL DECADENCE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
NATURAL DECADENCE wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
CINNAMON ROLLS: 4
vs
NATURAL DECADENCE: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CINNAMON ROLLS | NATURAL DECADENCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 361 cal | 333 cal | |
| Protein | 4.9 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 50.8 g | 31.3 g | |
| Fat | 16.4 g | 25 g | |
| Fiber | 1.6 g | 2.1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CINNAMON ROLLS | NATURAL DECADENCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CINNAMON ROLLS | NATURAL DECADENCE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 49 MG | 167 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.5 MG | 3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 66 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 328 MG | 135 MG |