CHUTNEY vs KALE CAESAR ROMAINE BLEND
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
KALE CAESAR ROMAINE BLEND wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
CHUTNEY: 2
vs
KALE CAESAR ROMAINE BLEND: 6
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHUTNEY | KALE CAESAR ROMAINE BLEND | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 250 cal | 207 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 6 g | |
| Carbs | 65 g | 9.3 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 16 g | |
| Fiber | 5 g | 1.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHUTNEY | KALE CAESAR ROMAINE BLEND | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHUTNEY | KALE CAESAR ROMAINE BLEND | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 133 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.7 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 200 MG | 393 MG |