CHUNK HAM vs 25% LESS SODIUM THAN SPAM CLASSIC
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie, both foods score equally across 11 nutrient categories
CHUNK HAM: 3
vs
25% LESS SODIUM THAN SPAM CLASSIC: 3
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHUNK HAM | 25% LESS SODIUM THAN SPAM CLASSIC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 161 cal | 321 cal | |
| Protein | 16.1 g | 12.5 g | |
| Carbs | 1.8 g | 1.8 g | Tie |
| Fat | 10.7 g | 28.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHUNK HAM | 25% LESS SODIUM THAN SPAM CLASSIC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHUNK HAM | 25% LESS SODIUM THAN SPAM CLASSIC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.7 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 339 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,000 MG | 1,036 MG |