CHUCK ROAST vs BACON-WRAPPED PORK SIRLOIN FILLETS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
BACON-WRAPPED PORK SIRLOIN FILLETS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHUCK ROAST: 1
vs
BACON-WRAPPED PORK SIRLOIN FILLETS: 5
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHUCK ROAST | BACON-WRAPPED PORK SIRLOIN FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 250 cal | 204 cal | |
| Protein | 17.0 g | 26.6 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 19.6 g | 9.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHUCK ROAST | BACON-WRAPPED PORK SIRLOIN FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHUCK ROAST | BACON-WRAPPED PORK SIRLOIN FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 18 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.9 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 67 MG | 150 MG |