CHOPPED SEA CLAMS vs WILD ALASKA SKINLESS & BONELESS PINK SALMON
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHOPPED SEA CLAMS wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHOPPED SEA CLAMS: 6
vs
WILD ALASKA SKINLESS & BONELESS PINK SALMON: 2
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHOPPED SEA CLAMS | WILD ALASKA SKINLESS & BONELESS PINK SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 42 cal | 103 cal | |
| Protein | 6.7 g | 22.4 g | |
| Carbs | 1.7 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHOPPED SEA CLAMS | WILD ALASKA SKINLESS & BONELESS PINK SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 2 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHOPPED SEA CLAMS | WILD ALASKA SKINLESS & BONELESS PINK SALMON | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 17 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.8 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 417 MG | 362 MG |