CHOCOLATE-COVERED BISCUIT ASSORTMENT vs MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED GRAHAMS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED GRAHAMS wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHOCOLATE-COVERED BISCUIT ASSORTMENT: 3
vs
MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED GRAHAMS: 6
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHOCOLATE-COVERED BISCUIT ASSORTMENT | MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED GRAHAMS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 517 cal | 474 cal | |
| Protein | 6.9 g | 5.3 g | |
| Carbs | 62.1 g | 65.8 g | |
| Fat | 27.6 g | 23.7 g | |
| Fiber | 3.4 g | 2.6 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHOCOLATE-COVERED BISCUIT ASSORTMENT | MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED GRAHAMS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 6.3 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHOCOLATE-COVERED BISCUIT ASSORTMENT | MILK CHOCOLATE COVERED GRAHAMS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 105 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 3.8 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 103 MG | 276 MG |