CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS vs EMERALD
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
EMERALD wins in 7 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS: 1
vs
EMERALD: 7
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS | EMERALD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 575 cal | 571 cal | |
| Protein | 10 g | 21.4 g | |
| Carbs | 47.5 g | 25 g | |
| Fat | 37.5 g | 46.4 g | |
| Fiber | 7.5 g | 10.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS | EMERALD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMONDS | EMERALD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 100 MG | 214 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.6 MG | 5.1 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 304 MG |