CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMOND-FILLED DATES vs DIAMOND OF CALIFORNIA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
DIAMOND OF CALIFORNIA wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMOND-FILLED DATES: 2
vs
DIAMOND OF CALIFORNIA: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMOND-FILLED DATES | DIAMOND OF CALIFORNIA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 385 cal | 567 cal | |
| Protein | 3.9 g | 20 g | |
| Carbs | 69.2 g | 20 g | |
| Fat | 11.5 g | 50 g | |
| Fiber | 3.8 g | 13.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHOCOLATE COVERED ALMOND-FILLED DATES | DIAMOND OF CALIFORNIA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 77 MG | 267 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.7 MG | 3.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |