CHOCOLATE COCONUT ALMONDS vs OATMEAL RAISIN SOFT BAKED COOKIES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
OATMEAL RAISIN SOFT BAKED COOKIES wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHOCOLATE COCONUT ALMONDS: 3
vs
OATMEAL RAISIN SOFT BAKED COOKIES: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHOCOLATE COCONUT ALMONDS | OATMEAL RAISIN SOFT BAKED COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 500 cal | 429 cal | |
| Protein | 10.7 g | 17.9 g | |
| Carbs | 50 g | 64.3 g | |
| Fat | 28.6 g | 16.1 g | |
| Fiber | 7.1 g | 3.6 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHOCOLATE COCONUT ALMONDS | OATMEAL RAISIN SOFT BAKED COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHOCOLATE COCONUT ALMONDS | OATMEAL RAISIN SOFT BAKED COOKIES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 71 MG | 71 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 3.9 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 232 MG | 268 MG |