CHIPOTLE PORK ROAST vs SMOKED THICK CUT LOWER SODIUM HAM STEAK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SMOKED THICK CUT LOWER SODIUM HAM STEAK wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHIPOTLE PORK ROAST: 2
vs
SMOKED THICK CUT LOWER SODIUM HAM STEAK: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHIPOTLE PORK ROAST | SMOKED THICK CUT LOWER SODIUM HAM STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 143 cal | 107 cal | |
| Protein | 15.5 g | 16.1 g | |
| Carbs | 4.8 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fat | 7.1 g | 2.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHIPOTLE PORK ROAST | SMOKED THICK CUT LOWER SODIUM HAM STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 8.6 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHIPOTLE PORK ROAST | SMOKED THICK CUT LOWER SODIUM HAM STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 24 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.9 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 381 MG | 643 MG |