CHIPOTLE LIME FLAVORED SAUSAGE vs SKINLESS BEEF FRANKFURTERS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHIPOTLE LIME FLAVORED SAUSAGE wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
CHIPOTLE LIME FLAVORED SAUSAGE: 5
vs
SKINLESS BEEF FRANKFURTERS: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHIPOTLE LIME FLAVORED SAUSAGE | SKINLESS BEEF FRANKFURTERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 329 cal | 300 cal | |
| Protein | 21.2 g | 12 g | |
| Carbs | 2.4 g | 2 g | |
| Fat | 25.9 g | 28 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHIPOTLE LIME FLAVORED SAUSAGE | SKINLESS BEEF FRANKFURTERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHIPOTLE LIME FLAVORED SAUSAGE | SKINLESS BEEF FRANKFURTERS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 35 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.8 MG | 0.7 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 376 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 800 MG | 820 MG |