CHINESE STYLE SWEET & SOUR SAUCE vs LEE KUM KEE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LEE KUM KEE wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
CHINESE STYLE SWEET & SOUR SAUCE: 2
vs
LEE KUM KEE: 4
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHINESE STYLE SWEET & SOUR SAUCE | LEE KUM KEE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 212 cal | 100 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 6.7 g | |
| Carbs | 60.6 g | 13.3 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHINESE STYLE SWEET & SOUR SAUCE | LEE KUM KEE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 0 UG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHINESE STYLE SWEET & SOUR SAUCE | LEE KUM KEE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 3 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 33 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 970 MG | 6,867 MG |