CHICKEN TIKKA MASALA ROASTED WHITE MEAT CHICKEN vs CALIFORNIA STYLE A PACIFIC COAST STYLE BLEND OF QUINOA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CALIFORNIA STYLE A PACIFIC COAST STYLE BLEND OF QUINOA wins in 8 out of 11 nutrient categories
CHICKEN TIKKA MASALA ROASTED WHITE MEAT CHICKEN: 2
vs
CALIFORNIA STYLE A PACIFIC COAST STYLE BLEND OF QUINOA: 8
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHICKEN TIKKA MASALA ROASTED WHITE MEAT CHICKEN | CALIFORNIA STYLE A PACIFIC COAST STYLE BLEND OF QUINOA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 122 cal | 102 cal | |
| Protein | 6.3 g | 5.0 g | |
| Carbs | 15.3 g | 13.8 g | |
| Fat | 3.9 g | 3.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0.8 g | 3.2 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHICKEN TIKKA MASALA ROASTED WHITE MEAT CHICKEN | CALIFORNIA STYLE A PACIFIC COAST STYLE BLEND OF QUINOA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 9.2 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHICKEN TIKKA MASALA ROASTED WHITE MEAT CHICKEN | CALIFORNIA STYLE A PACIFIC COAST STYLE BLEND OF QUINOA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 20 MG | 53 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.4 MG | 1.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 157 MG | 269 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 298 MG | 191 MG |