CHICKEN TAMALES WITH BLACK BEANS vs TABATCHNICK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TABATCHNICK wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
CHICKEN TAMALES WITH BLACK BEANS: 4
vs
TABATCHNICK: 6
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHICKEN TAMALES WITH BLACK BEANS | TABATCHNICK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 211 cal | 28 cal | |
| Protein | 3.5 g | 0.5 g | |
| Carbs | 21.8 g | 5.2 g | |
| Fat | 12.7 g | 0.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.5 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHICKEN TAMALES WITH BLACK BEANS | TABATCHNICK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 2.3 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHICKEN TAMALES WITH BLACK BEANS | TABATCHNICK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 160 MG | 9 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.7 MG | 0.2 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 46 MG | 52 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 423 MG | 235 MG |