CHICKEN TAMALES IN RED SAUCE WRAPPED IN TRADITIONAL CORN HUSKS vs STEAK CHIMICHURRI QUINOA WITH ROASTED SWEET POTATOES
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
STEAK CHIMICHURRI QUINOA WITH ROASTED SWEET POTATOES wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
CHICKEN TAMALES IN RED SAUCE WRAPPED IN TRADITIONAL CORN HUSKS: 4
vs
STEAK CHIMICHURRI QUINOA WITH ROASTED SWEET POTATOES: 6
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHICKEN TAMALES IN RED SAUCE WRAPPED IN TRADITIONAL CORN HUSKS | STEAK CHIMICHURRI QUINOA WITH ROASTED SWEET POTATOES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 177 cal | 137 cal | |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 7.1 g | |
| Carbs | 14.2 g | 18.0 g | |
| Fat | 10.6 g | 3.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHICKEN TAMALES IN RED SAUCE WRAPPED IN TRADITIONAL CORN HUSKS | STEAK CHIMICHURRI QUINOA WITH ROASTED SWEET POTATOES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 1.9 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHICKEN TAMALES IN RED SAUCE WRAPPED IN TRADITIONAL CORN HUSKS | STEAK CHIMICHURRI QUINOA WITH ROASTED SWEET POTATOES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 7 MG | 16 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.9 MG | 1.8 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 115 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 496 MG | 216 MG |