CHICKEN OF THE SEA vs WILD ALBACORE SOLID WHITE TUNA IN WATER
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 11 nutrient categories
CHICKEN OF THE SEA: 3
vs
WILD ALBACORE SOLID WHITE TUNA IN WATER: 3
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | WILD ALBACORE SOLID WHITE TUNA IN WATER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 92 cal | 125 cal | |
| Protein | 19.7 g | 26.8 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 1.3 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | WILD ALBACORE SOLID WHITE TUNA IN WATER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | WILD ALBACORE SOLID WHITE TUNA IN WATER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 321 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 263 MG | 179 MG |