CHICKEN OF THE SEA vs SOLID WILD TUNA STEAK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SOLID WILD TUNA STEAK wins in 8 out of 15 nutrient categories
CHICKEN OF THE SEA: 1
vs
SOLID WILD TUNA STEAK: 8
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | SOLID WILD TUNA STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 125 cal | 125 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 26.8 g | 30.4 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 0.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | SOLID WILD TUNA STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Niacin | 10.7 MG | 28.6 MG | |
| Vitamin B-12 | 1.1 UG | 0 UG | |
| Vitamin B-6 | 0.4 MG | 2.1 MG | |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | SOLID WILD TUNA STEAK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 134 MG | 375 MG | |
| Selenium, Se | 112 UG | 138 UG | |
| Sodium, Na | 62 MG | 304 MG |