CHICKEN OF THE SEA vs SOLID TUNA IN OIL
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SOLID TUNA IN OIL wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHICKEN OF THE SEA: 0
vs
SOLID TUNA IN OIL: 6
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | SOLID TUNA IN OIL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 179 cal | 156 cal | |
| Protein | 21.4 g | 23.1 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 10.7 g | 9.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | SOLID TUNA IN OIL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | SOLID TUNA IN OIL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 38 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.6 MG | 1.4 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 321 MG | 731 MG |