CHICKEN OF THE SEA vs SKIPJACK CHUNK LIGHT TUNA IN WATER
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SKIPJACK CHUNK LIGHT TUNA IN WATER wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
CHICKEN OF THE SEA: 2
vs
SKIPJACK CHUNK LIGHT TUNA IN WATER: 4
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | SKIPJACK CHUNK LIGHT TUNA IN WATER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 125 cal | 108 cal | |
| Protein | 28.6 g | 25.7 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 1.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | SKIPJACK CHUNK LIGHT TUNA IN WATER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | SKIPJACK CHUNK LIGHT TUNA IN WATER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 179 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 250 MG | 338 MG |