CHICKEN OF THE SEA vs ALBACORE SOLID WHITE TUNA IN WATER
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHICKEN OF THE SEA wins in 3 out of 11 nutrient categories
CHICKEN OF THE SEA: 3
vs
ALBACORE SOLID WHITE TUNA IN WATER: 2
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | ALBACORE SOLID WHITE TUNA IN WATER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 125 cal | 143 cal | |
| Protein | 28.6 g | 28.6 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 2.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | ALBACORE SOLID WHITE TUNA IN WATER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | ALBACORE SOLID WHITE TUNA IN WATER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 179 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 250 MG | 321 MG |