CHICKEN OF THE SEA vs MACKEREL
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MACKEREL wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHICKEN OF THE SEA: 0
vs
MACKEREL: 6
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | MACKEREL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 253 cal | 158 cal | |
| Protein | 19.0 g | 22.8 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 20.3 g | 7.0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | MACKEREL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | MACKEREL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 253 MG | 439 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.8 MG | 2.5 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 215 MG | 491 MG |