CHICKEN MARSALA vs ALOO MATAR
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ALOO MATAR wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
CHICKEN MARSALA: 4
vs
ALOO MATAR: 6
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHICKEN MARSALA | ALOO MATAR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 117 cal | 100 cal | |
| Protein | 9.8 g | 2.7 g | |
| Carbs | 13.9 g | 12.7 g | |
| Fat | 2.5 g | 4.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0.8 g | 1.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHICKEN MARSALA | ALOO MATAR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 1 MG | 6 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHICKEN MARSALA | ALOO MATAR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 11 MG | 27 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.7 MG | 0.5 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 182 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 171 MG | 433 MG |