CHICKEN FRANKS vs SWEET ITALIAN SAUSAGE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SWEET ITALIAN SAUSAGE wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHICKEN FRANKS: 3
vs
SWEET ITALIAN SAUSAGE: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHICKEN FRANKS | SWEET ITALIAN SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 244 cal | 235 cal | |
| Protein | 13.3 g | 17.7 g | |
| Carbs | 4.4 g | 1.3 g | |
| Fat | 17.8 g | 17.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHICKEN FRANKS | SWEET ITALIAN SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 2.7 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHICKEN FRANKS | SWEET ITALIAN SAUSAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 178 MG | 13 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.8 MG | 0.9 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 956 MG | 712 MG |