CHICKEN FRANKS vs NATURAL CASING FRANKS WITH BEEF & PORK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CHICKEN FRANKS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHICKEN FRANKS: 5
vs
NATURAL CASING FRANKS WITH BEEF & PORK: 2
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHICKEN FRANKS | NATURAL CASING FRANKS WITH BEEF & PORK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 250 cal | 286 cal | |
| Protein | 12.5 g | 12.5 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 1.8 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fat | 21.4 g | 25 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHICKEN FRANKS | NATURAL CASING FRANKS WITH BEEF & PORK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 2.1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHICKEN FRANKS | NATURAL CASING FRANKS WITH BEEF & PORK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 179 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.9 MG | 1.3 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 857 MG | 875 MG |