CHICKEN ALFREDO vs TUSCAN STYLE PORTABELLA MUSHROOMS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
TUSCAN STYLE PORTABELLA MUSHROOMS wins in 6 out of 12 nutrient categories
CHICKEN ALFREDO: 4
vs
TUSCAN STYLE PORTABELLA MUSHROOMS: 6
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHICKEN ALFREDO | TUSCAN STYLE PORTABELLA MUSHROOMS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 221 cal | 106 cal | |
| Protein | 10 g | 5.3 g | |
| Carbs | 12.9 g | 8.9 g | |
| Fat | 13.8 g | 5.3 g | |
| Fiber | 1.2 g | 1.8 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHICKEN ALFREDO | TUSCAN STYLE PORTABELLA MUSHROOMS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 4.2 MG | |
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 1 UG | 0 UG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHICKEN ALFREDO | TUSCAN STYLE PORTABELLA MUSHROOMS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 88 MG | 88 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0.5 MG | 1.0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 154 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 441 MG | 257 MG |