CHICHARRONES FRIED PORK RINDS vs OATSNACK
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
OATSNACK wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHICHARRONES FRIED PORK RINDS: 3
vs
OATSNACK: 6
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHICHARRONES FRIED PORK RINDS | OATSNACK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 571 cal | 400 cal | |
| Protein | 64.3 g | 6.7 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 56.7 g | |
| Fat | 35.7 g | 16.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 6.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHICHARRONES FRIED PORK RINDS | OATSNACK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 320 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHICHARRONES FRIED PORK RINDS | OATSNACK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 67 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 2.4 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 857 MG | 233 MG |