CHICAGO FLATS vs RUSTIC PARTAGE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
RUSTIC PARTAGE wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHICAGO FLATS: 3
vs
RUSTIC PARTAGE: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHICAGO FLATS | RUSTIC PARTAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 389 cal | 250 cal | |
| Protein | 11.1 g | 7.9 g | |
| Carbs | 61.1 g | 52.6 g | |
| Fat | 8.3 g | 0.7 g | |
| Fiber | 5.6 g | 1.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHICAGO FLATS | RUSTIC PARTAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHICAGO FLATS | RUSTIC PARTAGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 4 MG | 3.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 528 MG | 539 MG |