CHICAGO FLATS vs SOURDOUGH MULTIGRAIN
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SOURDOUGH MULTIGRAIN wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
CHICAGO FLATS: 3
vs
SOURDOUGH MULTIGRAIN: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHICAGO FLATS | SOURDOUGH MULTIGRAIN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 389 cal | 246 cal | |
| Protein | 11.1 g | 7.0 g | |
| Carbs | 72.2 g | 47.4 g | |
| Fat | 8.3 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.5 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHICAGO FLATS | SOURDOUGH MULTIGRAIN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHICAGO FLATS | SOURDOUGH MULTIGRAIN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 35 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 4 MG | 3.2 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,000 MG | 386 MG |