CHESAPEAKE BAY HUMMUS vs MILD HATCH CHILE HUMMUS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MILD HATCH CHILE HUMMUS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
CHESAPEAKE BAY HUMMUS: 4
vs
MILD HATCH CHILE HUMMUS: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CHESAPEAKE BAY HUMMUS | MILD HATCH CHILE HUMMUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 250 cal | 250 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 3.6 g | 7.1 g | |
| Carbs | 10.7 g | 14.3 g | |
| Fat | 21.4 g | 17.9 g | |
| Fiber | 3.6 g | 7.1 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CHESAPEAKE BAY HUMMUS | MILD HATCH CHILE HUMMUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 4.3 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CHESAPEAKE BAY HUMMUS | MILD HATCH CHILE HUMMUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 71 MG | 39 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.3 MG | 3.6 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 286 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 464 MG | 357 MG |