CAPOCOLLA vs SLOW COOKED UNCURED HAM
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SLOW COOKED UNCURED HAM wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
CAPOCOLLA: 3
vs
SLOW COOKED UNCURED HAM: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CAPOCOLLA | SLOW COOKED UNCURED HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 250 cal | 109 cal | |
| Protein | 26.8 g | 20 g | |
| Carbs | 1.8 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 16.1 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CAPOCOLLA | SLOW COOKED UNCURED HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CAPOCOLLA | SLOW COOKED UNCURED HAM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 9 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.9 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 356 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 1,714 MG | 800 MG |