CANNED WHOLE CHICKEN WITHOUT GIBLETS vs HARRIS TEETER
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
HARRIS TEETER wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
CANNED WHOLE CHICKEN WITHOUT GIBLETS: 1
vs
HARRIS TEETER: 6
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CANNED WHOLE CHICKEN WITHOUT GIBLETS | HARRIS TEETER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 161 cal | 107 cal | |
| Protein | 10.7 g | 23.2 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 12.5 g | 1.8 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CANNED WHOLE CHICKEN WITHOUT GIBLETS | HARRIS TEETER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 4.3 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | CANNED WHOLE CHICKEN WITHOUT GIBLETS | HARRIS TEETER | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 71 MG | 36 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.6 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 268 MG | 482 MG |