CANNED MACKEREL vs CHICKEN OF THE SEA
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CANNED MACKEREL wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
CANNED MACKEREL: 4
vs
CHICKEN OF THE SEA: 2
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | CANNED MACKEREL | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 140 cal | 253 cal | |
| Protein | 17 g | 19.0 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 8 g | 20.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | CANNED MACKEREL | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | CANNED MACKEREL | CHICKEN OF THE SEA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 300 MG | 253 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.8 MG | 1.8 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 710 MG | 215 MG |